Trump Libel Complaint vs New York Times Stricken
By Reuters | 19 Sep, 2025
The court struck Trump complaint's allegations for filling it with vituperative invectives rather than concisely giving notice of the factual and legal basis of its alleged claims.
The New York Times building in Manhattan. (Reuters Photo)
A federal judge on Friday struck Donald Trump's $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the New York Times over its content, calling it a "decidedly improper" effort to attack an adversary.
U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday in Tampa, Florida said Trump's complaint violated a federal civil procedure rule requiring a short and plain statement of why he should prevail.
A complaint should "fairly, precisely, directly, soberly, and economically inform the defendants ... of the nature and content of the claims," Merryday wrote. "A complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective--not a protected platform to rage against an adversary."
Merryday gave Trump 28 days to file an amended complaint of no more than 40 pages. The White House and Trump's lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York, Editing by Franklin Paul)
Recent Articles
- 5 Magic Spices to Take Your Cooking Cordon-Bleu Adjacent
- Swiss Reject Population Cap in Referendum, Avoiding EU Clash
- Trump Loses Support in Rural America as Fuel and Food Prices Climb
- How Much I Really Spent In Japan
- Tehran Says Deal Won't Be Signed Sunday
- Two Phones and an App: How Russians Skirt Putin's Digital Iron Curtain
- Mag 7? MANGOS? Post-SpaceX Wall Street's Forced to Invent New Shorthand
- Trump Removed from Kennedy Center in Predawn Operation
- Zuckerberg Says Meta Made 'Mistakes' in AI Workforce Shift
- LE SSERAFIM Hits Stratosphere with Iconic Summer Collaboration
